Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 6500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 6500X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 545g / 19,22oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa BG 6500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
