Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 8000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 8000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 545g / 19,22oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX
