Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
