Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
