Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX
