Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
