Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
