Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Delphin BRONZ 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin BRONZ 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin BRONZ?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin BRONZ 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
