Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
60.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight269g / 9.49oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX
