Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.55 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
