Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin SHARX?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
