Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
