Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
