Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Mitchell 308 PRO?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
