Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Penn Slammer IV?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
