Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Aero C3000X
