Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a ball bearings of 7, while Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
