Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano Catana FE 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Catana FE 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX
