Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
57.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
