Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
