Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX
