Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
