Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sienna
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Shimano Sienna 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Sienna 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sienna?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sienna 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
