Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
92.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
