Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
