Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Spinning
47.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 1000 RC, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Shimano Catana 1000 RC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Catana 1000 RC?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Catana 1000 RC
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa BG 5000X
