Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX
