Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €130.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX and Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX stands out for a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
- A gear ratio of 4:9:1 (scoring 6.11 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
