Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.92 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
