Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.92 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.53 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX
