Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX edges out Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.6 out of 10) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
