Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind, 20 LW LH , left hand, Multi Fishing Reel, Star Drag, 1545926
Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €138.60
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size20 LW LH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeStar drag
  • Handle orientationLeft
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD, 4012QD, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Reel, Front Drag, 10516-412
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €249.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4012QD
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). While Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables