Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX and Daiwa BG 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX offers a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs, while Daiwa BG 3000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Daiwa BG?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
- At a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Scoring 8.33 out of 10 (500g / 17,64oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
Daiwa BG 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
