Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight675g / 23.81oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/300

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.93 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Decent value at €809.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
