Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
87.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight680g / 23.99oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/330

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
