Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
87.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight680g / 23.99oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/330

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
