Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
87.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight680g / 23.99oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/330

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
