Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
87.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight680g / 23.99oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/330

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
