Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
71.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight675g / 23.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/350

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
