Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
71.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight675g / 23.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/350

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX edges out Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
