Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
71.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight675g / 23.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/350

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (205g / 7,23oz). Still, Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
