Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano 19 Stella 30000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.8:1). While Shimano 19 Stella 30000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
