Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano 19 Stella 30000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and weight (195g / 6,88oz). While Shimano 19 Stella 30000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
