Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 30000X and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 30000X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 30000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
