Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 30000X and Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 30000X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano 19 Stella 30000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
