Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 30000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (6.14 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 30000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano 19 Stella 30000X
- Decent value at €959.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
