Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 30000X and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 30000X offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Shimano 19 Stella 30000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
