Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
