Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
