Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin YUPIE
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
Delphin INKS 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Delphin INKS 3000X